I hope you find this site as resourceful and entertaining as I do
First--I'm not sure what you mean by linking details up with the big picture?
Second--I struggle with logisitical details; I really hate thinking about them
Third--I'm not a big picture kind of gal, I'm not sure I understand what a "big picture" would be. I understand there are cliche expressions for it....liking climbing to a higher elevation and observing the far reaching landscape versus what the landscape looks like being on foot on the ground. For me, I'm not sure I could link up the two differing perspectives. My "middle ground" would be to take an area of land with definite limits and study the details until the entire area becomes familiar and thereafter I would have both a "big picture" and a "small picture" image. Or I suppose "middle ground" could be viewed as "literal" and I would sit in tree tops where I'd have the option of looking outward AND looking down to see everything below. My husband is a big-picture guy and sometimes includes "details" when they are necessary for a far reaching objective, but likewise, he misses some of those details like I do when they are not relevant. In his case, I would say that they aren't that relevant, necessary, important afterall




