Operator Dimensions: The Key to Unlocking

David Mark's politically incorrect views on the past, present, and future. Primary Interest in science, mathematics, history, comparative complexity, very little relationship to Keirsey Temperament except I assume it.

Operator Dimensions: The Key to Unlocking

Postby keirsey on Thu May 14, 2009 3:25 pm

I have made a major theoretical breakthrough in my work. The new idea is what I call "operator dimensions".

I am now developing (when I can steal some time), the field of DK dimensions, DK spaces, DK languages in the form of "programmable language". One can view mathematics as a language, but in the past it was hard to incorporate "semantics" (meaning) in a precise and disciplined way. Mathematicians have used "semantics" (in the form of physics and geometry) as a primary driver, like Archimedes, Newton, and Gauss. But in the recent centuries, they more and more relied on syntactical "patterns" in the form of "numbers" to get insight, such as the work of Cantor, Hilbert, and Grothendieck. I too, started out that way of Grothendieck, because of new math, but my father always argued with me in this regard. More recently, I tried to start from the most simple elements (boolean logic or things like Heyting algebras, in some sense the most syntactic), and using Robert Rosen ideas an important elaboration of my father's approach, as my basis and my "words."

We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.
-- Albert Einstein


I progressed learning a lot of mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, economics, yada yada. But, only when I, instead of fabricating (analysis and synthesis) "bottom up -- e.g., boolean," and I started fabricating (analysis and synthesis) "top down" did I realize the key. The following encapsulates mathematics, with essentially five SEMANTIC symbols. The task is to expand from those five semantic symbols, creating other languages with more symbols derived from this foundation, and not violating semantics or syntax, or being arbitrary in one's assignments (and creation) with other semantic symbols (and not overloading them either). With those five symbols one can fabricate mathematics (and new mathematics) and maybe even, the universe in the abstract.

Image

Not showing the operator (i.e., ^: the power of), one can get the repeating string: eπi101iπe
The point being the "value" of this circular (and "recursive" in a way) string has a SEMANTIC FIXED POINT.

eπi101iπeπi101iπeπi101iπeπi101iπe ... <=> 1

That is, eπi101iπe = 1, moreover, eπi1 = -1, 00 = 1, 01iπe = 1, {so one can create the string [-1,1,-1,1,-1, ....]}
Another point is 01iπe = 0abcd for all a,b,c,d in otherwords, the only SEMANTIC FIXED POINT IN THIS VERY SPECIFIC STRING (01iπe) is zero.

Image

Regarding an infinite number of connected spaces.

Regarding the growth of good/bad ideas

Regarding the birth and death of bad/good ideas.
Within which edge of chaos are you?
User avatarUser Temperament
keirsey
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1733
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:43 pm
Location: Carlsbad, CA

Re: Operator Dimensions: The Key to Unlocking

Postby mkb32 on Thu May 14, 2009 6:56 pm

Good for you, Dave.
A new language. Very cool, Dave.
I shall be Phoenix ... just for the record ... I can raise the house...
ANNNND I really do want to get a hold of that Wolverine guy...
User avatarUser Temperament
mkb32
Personologist
Personologist
 
Posts: 1680
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:00 am
Location: GA, USA

Re: Operator Dimensions: The Key to Unlocking

Postby Architron on Thu May 14, 2009 8:26 pm

I sort of maybe possibly get it.

This means you should explain more.
I am, by far, the most modest person you will ever have the pleasure of meeting. Ever.
User avatarUser Temperament
Architron
 
Posts: 342
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Operator Dimensions: The Key to Unlocking

Postby fuzzynavelnot21 on Thu May 14, 2009 11:11 pm

I sorta maybe possibly not in any way get it.

This means explaining more is lost on me, haha.



It is really cool to be very good at a specific field of study. I know it doesn't mean as much maybe coming from someone who has no idea really what you are talking about, but good job Dave! You obviously put a lot of hard work and effort into this and that I can recognize and commend. :)
The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances: if there is any reaction, both are transformed.-- Carl Jung
User avatarUser Temperament
fuzzynavelnot21
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:09 pm
Location: Vancouver, WA

Re: Operator Dimensions: The Key to Unlocking

Postby Goodrum on Fri May 15, 2009 2:12 am

Keirsey:
We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.
-- Albert Einstein


I progressed learning a lot of mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, economics, yada yada. But, only when I, instead of fabricating (analysis and synthesis) "bottom up -- e.g., boolean," and I started fabricating (analysis and synthesis) "top down" did I realize the key. The following encapsulates mathematics, with essentially five SEMANTIC symbols. The task is to expand from those five semantic symbols, creating other languages with more symbols derived from this foundation, and not violating semantics or syntax, or being arbitrary in one's assignments (and creation) with other semantic symbols (and not overloading them either). With those five symbols one can fabricate mathematics (and new mathematics) and maybe even, the universe in the abstract.


This is what hit home for me Fuzzy.

I think he has discovered something really wonderful about his thought process/mindset even perhaps..he has turned around some problem? solving skills and shook them upside down.

The technical side, well, I looked at my keyboard to see if I had those little house figurine thingys, and I'm sad to say nope!

Congratulations DK, fabricating mathematics and the universe in abstract...this sounds like rational fun. Serious rational fun.
I would start with stripping down to what fundamentally informs my life, which is that I'm a seeker on the path...where I stand spiritually is, steadfastly, on a path about love.. (Bell Hooks)
User avatarUser Temperament
Goodrum
Personologist
Personologist
 
Posts: 11144
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:53 am

Re: Operator Dimensions: The Key to Unlocking

Postby Goodrum on Fri May 15, 2009 2:15 am

I think this could be as big and exciting as hadron collider stuff.
I would start with stripping down to what fundamentally informs my life, which is that I'm a seeker on the path...where I stand spiritually is, steadfastly, on a path about love.. (Bell Hooks)
User avatarUser Temperament
Goodrum
Personologist
Personologist
 
Posts: 11144
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:53 am

Re: Operator Dimensions: The Key to Unlocking

Postby Stig on Fri May 15, 2009 3:39 am

But remember: 0^0=1. (Only nitpicking...)
User avatarUser Temperament
Stig
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:24 am

Re: Operator Dimensions: The Key to Unlocking

Postby mkb32 on Fri May 15, 2009 7:34 am

Stig wrote:But remember: 0^0=1. (Only nitpicking...)


now that is funny.

go stig ... go stig ... go, go, go ...
I shall be Phoenix ... just for the record ... I can raise the house...
ANNNND I really do want to get a hold of that Wolverine guy...
User avatarUser Temperament
mkb32
Personologist
Personologist
 
Posts: 1680
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:00 am
Location: GA, USA

Re: Operator Dimensions: The Key to Unlocking

Postby keirsey on Fri May 15, 2009 12:02 pm

Stig wrote:But remember: 0^0=1. (Only nitpicking...)


I love a straight man. Also when defining "to the power of" 0^1=0^0=1^0=1^1=1. NOTE THE AMBIGUITY. One might conclude that 0=1, NON-SENSE. Actually it isn't COMPLETE non-sense, THERE ARE CONTEXTs (in mathematics) where 0=1 MAKES SENSE, namely (FOR EXAMPLE) the COMPLEX PLANE C-- that is 0 = 0 + 1i (where i is the square root of -1) and i is considered anOTHER dimension.

There is ANOTHER way to create two "supposely" independent dimensions -- it is called the cartesian -- or R^2 (where R are the Reals). One can denote a coordinate -- like [0,1] or [0,0], or more generally [a,b] where a,b are members of R. This composition is called the Euclidean plane. The complex C "plane" is the SAME in FORM (in other words EQUIVALENT), as R^2 but they are NOT the SAME. NOTE THE AMBIGUITY (in a very precise way).
Within which edge of chaos are you?
User avatarUser Temperament
keirsey
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1733
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:43 pm
Location: Carlsbad, CA

Re: Operator Dimensions: The Key to Unlocking

Postby Earl on Fri May 15, 2009 4:16 pm

I love ambiguity... 8-)

Never thought I'd see it in math :D 8-) 8-)
I wanted men to feel pain like Hoom, so there could be men like Hoom...
(Jason Worthing, The Worthing Saga, Orson Scott Card)
User avatarUser Temperament
Earl
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 7:57 am

Next

Return to keirseycomplexity

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest